Current Latest News

View: Social media firms are not digital media companies. The new IT guidelines fail to get this fact

So, while the government may be within its rights to regulate recalcitrant social media platforms — given the recent incidents with Twitter and WhatsApp — by what right can it afford to muzzle the press?


But in ostensibly trying to create a level censorship field to discourage future misuse, GoI has ingeniously killed two birds with one stone: a press release that criticises the government could be forced down as easily as a social media handle that promotes violent insurrection.

Imagine a market with many manufacturers but only a few distribution channels. One day, the government takes issue with a particular channel because it refuses to comply with a request to stop advertising a specific brand of, say, imported gummy lozenge. The lozenge, claims GoI, is psychotropic and liable to promote a form of hallucination that is at odds with what is allowed or prescribed.To quash future insubordination, instead of specifying

  • SAVE

Sign in to read the full article

You’ve got this Prime Story as a Free Gift

Already a Member?

Why ?

  • Sharp Insight-rich, Indepth stories across 20+ sectors

  • Access the exclusive Economic Times stories, Editorial and Expert opinion

  • Clean experience with
    Minimal Ads

  • Comment & Engage with ET Prime community

  • Exclusive invites to Virtual Events with Industry Leaders

  • A trusted team of Journalists & Analysts who can best filter signal from noise

Source link

Related posts

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy